Every launchpad on Robinhood Chain, and what each one changes

How to read this comparison

Four properties separate these platforms, and each one has a practical consequence for anybody trading or copying the tokens that come out of them.

• Quote asset: what the new token trades against. ETH behaves the way you expect. A tokenized stock means your profit and loss is measured in NVDA or SPY rather than in ETH.
• Curve or direct pool: a bonding curve has a graduation event and a migration, so the market you enter early is not the market you exit later. A direct pool has one market from block one.
• Liquidity locking: whether the creator can remove the liquidity. Permanently locked liquidity removes one specific rug, not all of them.
• Fee routing: who gets paid per trade, and whether a configurable tax changes your effective entry price.

The full comparison

Pons: where most of the flow still starts

Pons is the reference point for the chain. In the 31 August 2026 fee snapshot published by The Defiant, Pons took 4.89 million dollars of launchpad fees, about 63.9 percent of all launchpad fees measured that day across every chain, with Pons V1 adding a further 508,139 dollars. Thirty day fees were put at 31.03 million dollars. Robinhood Chain itself did 1.49 billion dollars of DEX volume in that 24 hour window.

For a copier the practical read is simple: the wallets worth following will usually have Pons launches in their history, because that is where the volume is. It does not follow that you should restrict a copy engine to Pons. The same wallets trade elsewhere on the chain, and a Pons-only bot goes blind the moment a leader moves.

The stock-paired group: LONG, PAIR and Flap

This is the genuinely new idea on Robinhood Chain, and it exists because the chain carries tokenized Stock Tokens natively. Instead of quoting a new token against ETH, these platforms quote it against AAPL, NVDA, SPY and their peers.

LONG pairs each launch with one Stock Token chosen by the creator, so a ticker like AI/NVDA describes a pool that swaps a community token for an NVDA Stock Token. It ships a 24 hour ticker reservation against sniping, validates launches through an official factory, and gives genuine LONG tokens addresses that end in 1e18 so they can be recognised on chain.

PAIR goes further and deploys up to five pools at once, one for each stock the creator selects from a list of 24, in a single atomic transaction with a fixed supply of one billion tokens and no curve or migration at all. Its interface then routes a single buy or sell across those pools through an aggregator, using USDG as the common leg, and rejects routes with more than 15 percent live price impact.

Flap takes the same stock idea in a third direction: the chosen stock can be both the quote asset and the dividend asset, so holders receive tokenized stock rewards on chain simply for holding. Tokens deploy straight into a Uniswap v3 pool with single-sided liquidity and a locked LP, so there is no graduation to wait for.

The ETH-quoted group: pools.trade, LetsCash and Pons

If you want a copied position denominated in the asset you funded the wallet with, these are the venues that behave conventionally.

pools.trade is Uniswap Labs' own launch platform, live on Robinhood Chain since 5 August 2026. Every launch ends as a Uniswap v4 pool with a fixed supply of one billion tokens, an LP fee of 0.25 percent that autocompounds into a permanently locked position, and no launchpad fee at all. Instant Launch uses a classic bonding curve with no minimum and lets the creator buy in the launch block so snipers cannot be first. Crowd Launch collects bids over four hours with TWAP pricing and refunds everyone if the launch does not reach a 10,000 dollar FDV.

LetsCash comes from the CASHCAT community and links launches to a burn mechanism. One transaction deploys a coin with a fixed supply of one billion, seeds a Uniswap pool priced in ETH or USDG and locks the liquidity forever. The trading tax is configurable and can be routed to the creator, to several wallets, or back into buying and burning the coin, with creator mode splitting 70 to the creator and 30 to the protocol and self-burn mode using 70 percent to buy and burn. Creator fees are paid in ETH and claimable at any time.

A configurable tax is the detail a copier should notice. On a taxed token your effective entry price is worse than the pool price, and the tax also applies when you leave, so the round trip needs a bigger move to break even.

Agent and social launches: Bankr and o1

Two platforms change how a launch is triggered rather than what the pool looks like afterwards. Bankr is an AI assistant that deploys tokens, trades and moves funds from natural language commands, with tokens defaulting to Robinhood Chain, and its documentation describes creators earning 95 percent of a 0.7 percent swap fee when deploying through Doppler. o1 Launchpad turns a social post into a launch, with a 0.001 ETH creation fee plus gas, 0.5 percent of every trade routed to the creator, and permanently locked Uniswap v4 liquidity on both Base and Robinhood Chain.

Both produce bursty flow: a post lands, a token exists seconds later, and the first minutes are the whole market. If you copy wallets that hunt these launches, the maximum trade age setting is what protects you from entering a burst that already ended.

The two venues that need a warning label

NOXA Fun was the chain's first breakout launchpad. It deployed more than 60,000 tokens, at its peak accounted for roughly three quarters of all token launches on the chain, and for five consecutive days took more protocol fees than Pump.fun, ending with about 12 million dollars of cumulative fees. It halted new launches on 11 July 2026 and went dark two days later, citing copycat token floods, bot spam and vampire attacks on new pools. CASHCAT, the memecoin behind most of that activity, fell more than 33 percent in the following 24 hours.

hood.fun is the opposite problem: plenty of coverage, thin verification. Third-party guides describe a bonding curve with migration into a locked Uniswap v3 position, and one of them states openly that it could not verify the creation fee, the curve fee or the migration threshold from independently checkable sources as of 31 August 2026. Read on 14 September 2026, hood.fun's own site presents itself as a concept preview with features labelled coming soon and illustration only.

Where the launchpad fees were going on 31 August 2026

One dated snapshot is more useful than a vague claim about dominance. On 31 August 2026, total launchpad fees across crypto were 7.65 million dollars, and launchpads deployed on Robinhood Chain took about 70 percent of that between them.

Two caveats. Flap is not in that particular table but was reported separately with 2.68 million dollars of seven day fees as of the same date, and a snapshot is a single day: a launchpad can go from a rounding error to the top of the table in a week on this chain, which is exactly what NOXA did and then undid.

Copying wallets across all of these at once

The reason a copy engine should be venue agnostic is visible in this comparison. A wallet worth following might buy a Pons launch, rotate into a stock-paired LONG token, and take a PAIR multipool position in the same hour. Detection that depends on recognising a venue misses whichever venue it has not been taught.

Filtering ERC-20 Transfer logs by the leader address as an indexed topic sidesteps that entirely. Tokens moving into the wallet is a buy and tokens moving out is a sell, regardless of whether the trade went through a v4 hook, a v3 band, a v2 pair or a five-pool aggregator route. On Robinhood Chain that matters more than elsewhere, because v4 swap events name the router rather than the trader and ERC-4337 smart accounts hide behind shared bundlers.

Following a wallet from any of these venues

1. 01Decide which quote asset you wantETH-quoted venues keep your profit and loss in ETH. Stock-paired venues denominate it in a Stock Token. Mixing both is fine as long as you know which is which.
2. 02Find wallets with real history on those venuesOpen a candidate on Robinscan and look for completed round trips, not only entries. A wallet that has never sold has not proven an exit.
3. 03Follow them in the panel and give each a budgetA per-leader budget bounds the total cost of a wallet that turns bad, and a per-trade cap bounds a single oversized buy.
4. 04Set filters for the venue typeTaxed tokens need a tax ceiling, thin pools need a minimum pool size, and burst launches need a maximum trade age so you do not enter a move that already finished.
5. 05Arm the engine and read the rejection logEvery skipped candidate is logged with the rule that stopped it, so you can tell a strict filter from a broken setting.

Questions people actually ask